SharePoint Permission Report: Complete Guide to Access AuditingAccess control is a cornerstone of secure collaboration. In SharePoint environments — whether SharePoint Online (Microsoft 365) or on-premises SharePoint Server — permissions can become complex quickly. A well-structured SharePoint permission report helps administrators and security teams understand who has access to what, identify excessive or broken permissions, and meet compliance or audit requirements. This guide walks through concepts, preparation, methods to generate reports, interpretation, automation, and best practices.
Why permission reporting matters
- SharePoint sites often inherit permissions and accumulate unique permissions over time; the result is a permissions landscape that is hard to visualize.
- Auditors and compliance frameworks require demonstrable access reviews and least-privilege enforcement.
- Permission reports identify security risks: orphaned groups, users with excessive rights, guest accounts, or stale access.
- They support operational tasks: onboarding/offboarding verification, migration planning, and cleanup.
Key concepts and permission model quick reference
SharePoint permissions are a layered model:
- Permission levels — Predefined sets of rights (Full Control, Edit, Contribute, Read). Custom permission levels can be created.
- SharePoint groups — Collections of users assigned permission levels at site or list/library scopes.
- Authentication principals — Users, security groups (Azure AD/AD), and external guests.
- Inheritance — By default, lists/libraries and items inherit site permissions. Break inheritance to assign unique permissions.
- Role assignments — The pairing of a principal (user/group) and a permission level on a securable object (site, list, item).
Understanding these lets you interpret a report correctly: a permission entry may be direct (user assigned), indirect (user in a SharePoint group), or via Azure/AD security groups. External sharing adds another dimension (guest users, links with access).
What to include in a comprehensive permission report
A useful report should be actionable and human-readable. Include:
- Object scope: site collection, site (web), list/library, folder, item.
- Object URL or path and title.
- Inheritance status (inherited or broken).
- Principal: username, display name, email, principal type (User, SharePoint Group, AD Group, Guest).
- Source of assignment: direct, SharePoint group membership, AD group membership.
- Permission level(s) assigned.
- Date of assignment or last permission change (if available).
- External sharing indicators (guest, anonymous link).
- Owner(s) of the site or object.
- Notes/flags: e.g., “high privilege,” “external user,” “rarely used.”
Include counts and summaries: number of unique permissions, number of external users, top users with many accesses, sites with most unique permissions.
Methods to generate SharePoint permission reports
Below are the common approaches, increasing in complexity and capability.
1) Manual inspection (small environments)
Use site settings > Site permissions > Check Permissions and examine group membership. This is only practical for very small sites or spot checks.
2) SharePoint UI and built-in reports (limited)
- SharePoint Online admin center and Microsoft 365 compliance center provide some site-level sharing and access reports.
- The “Access control” and “Sharing” pages surface external sharing info but do not produce detailed item-level permission matrices.
3) PowerShell (recommended for flexibility)
PowerShell is the most common approach for admins to generate tailored reports.
- For SharePoint Online, use:
- SharePoint Online Management Shell (SPO module) for site-level operations.
- PnP.PowerShell (recommended) for richer, easier object model access and cross-tenant scripting.
- For SharePoint Server (on-prem), use the SharePoint Server Management Shell and server-side APIs.
Example PnP.PowerShell approach (conceptual steps):
- Connect to site: Connect-PnPOnline -Url https://contoso.sharepoint.com/sites/siteA -Interactive
- Enumerate webs, lists, and items.
- For each securable object, check HasUniqueRoleAssignments and RoleAssignments.
- For each RoleAssignment, record principal (User/Group), role definition bindings (permission levels).
- Expand group membership (SharePoint groups and AD/Azure groups where possible).
- Export results to CSV/Excel.
Considerations:
- Resolving nested AD/Azure group membership may require Azure AD Graph or Microsoft Graph API calls.
- Item-level reporting is heavy; scope accordingly to avoid performance issues.
4) Microsoft Graph + REST APIs
Microsoft Graph APIs give a modern way to query users, groups, and SharePoint (via drive, lists, sites endpoints). Useful when integrating with other systems or for resolving AAD group membership. Requires app registration and permission consent.
5) Third-party tools
Several vendors offer enterprise reporting and governance tools that scan SharePoint (and other Microsoft 365 services) to produce permission maps, highlight risks, and automate remediation. These tools often handle nested group resolution, scheduled scans, and reporting dashboards.
Sample PowerShell report flow (PnP.PowerShell)
High-level steps (abbreviated pseudocode):
Connect-PnPOnline -Url $siteUrl -Interactive $objects = Get-PnPSubWebs -Recurse | ForEach-Object { $_ } + Get-PnPList foreach ($obj in $objects) { if ($obj.HasUniqueRoleAssignments) { foreach ($ra in $obj.RoleAssignments) { $principal = ResolvePrincipal($ra.Member) $roles = $ra.RoleDefinitionBindings | Select -ExpandProperty Name Output row: SiteUrl, ObjectUrl, ObjectType, PrincipalType, PrincipalName, PrincipalEmail, Roles, InheritanceBroken } } else { # record inherited status or enumerate parent role assignments } } Export-Csv -Path "PermissionsReport.csv" -NoTypeInformation Notes:
- Implement ResolvePrincipal to expand SharePoint groups and call Azure AD for security group members if needed.
- Use batching and throttling handling for large tenants.
Interpreting the report — common patterns and red flags
Look for:
- Excessive use of unique permissions: many lists/items with broken inheritance increase administrative overhead and risk.
- Users with high privilege across multiple sites (Full Control or Edit) who don’t need it.
- External/guest accounts with privileged access — escalate or review immediately.
- Large numbers of site owners or inconsistent ownership.
- AD/Azure security groups used as principals where membership is unknown; unresolved groups are an audit blind spot.
- Orphaned users (accounts no longer active but still in permissions).
- Document-level unique permissions on many items — often unnecessary and brittle.
Flagging approach: add severity tags (High, Medium, Low) based on criteria like external + edit, full control granted to many users, or high number of unique role assignments.
Remediation and governance actions
- Consolidate permissions using SharePoint groups and AD/Azure groups with well-understood membership.
- Re-enable inheritance where unique permissions are not required.
- Implement least privilege: audit owners and reduce Full Control assignments.
- Remove or convert guest/anonymous access; require sharing via authenticated links where possible.
- Establish an access review cadence: periodic reviews (quarterly/biannual) for critical sites.
- Document and enforce provisioning patterns so new sites follow a consistent permission model.
- Use automation: PowerShell scripts or governance tools to detect and optionally remediate issues.
Automation and scheduling
- Use scheduled PowerShell runs (Azure Automation, Microsoft Graph PowerShell runbooks, or scheduled tasks) to generate recurring permission reports and store them in a secure location (SharePoint site, Azure Storage, SIEM).
- Integrate with alerting: if a high-severity condition is detected (external user with edit on sensitive site), send an automated email to site owners and security team.
- Maintain historical snapshots to show permission drift over time for audits.
Sample report layout (columns)
- SiteCollectionUrl
- WebUrl
- ListLibrary
- ItemUrl
- ObjectType
- HasUniquePermissions (True/False)
- PrincipalType (User, SharePointGroup, ADGroup, Guest)
- PrincipalName
- PrincipalEmail
- PermissionLevel
- AssignmentSource (Direct, GroupMembership)
- LastModified (if available)
- ExternalShare (Yes/No)
- Owner
- SeverityFlag
- Notes
Best practices checklist
- Map ownership: ensure every site has at least one responsible owner and a documented steward.
- Minimize unique permissions; use inheritance and groups.
- Prefer AD/Azure groups for assignment; document group membership procedures.
- Regularly review external sharing settings and guest accounts.
- Automate reporting and keep historical records.
- Train site owners on permission concepts and provide simple templates/policies to follow.
Example use cases
- Pre-migration audit: export permission maps to plan consolidation and preserving access.
- Compliance audit: produce snapshot of who had access at a point in time.
- Incident response: quickly identify privileged users on an impacted site.
- Clean-up project: find sites with many unique permissions for targeted remediation.
Final notes
A SharePoint permission report is both a diagnostic and governance tool. The technical method you choose should match your environment’s scale and compliance needs: manual checks for small scenarios, scripted PowerShell or Graph-driven exports for medium environments, and enterprise third-party tools for large, complex tenants. Prioritize actionable fields, establish recurring reporting, and tie findings to remediation workflows so reports lead to real security improvements.
Leave a Reply